Category Archives: book reports

Book Report: Sunrise on the Reaping

Recently, I found out that my gut feeling about a friendship was spot on.  Several years ago I was betrayed by someone regarding a relationship I had with a man I cared for deeply.  I cringe just thinking about all the times I poured my heart out to this woman and I feel like such an idiot.

No matter how all flowers and butterflies we try to spin our world, we really need to listen to our respective guts.  And I take full responsibility for my role/naiveté in this disastrous chapter of my life.  It is not anyone’s fault.  I did this to myself, although maybe she was inadvertently doing me a favor.  Men don’t belong on pedestals.

Now, law of attraction-wise, religion-wise and otherwise, we all know that what you believe becomes your truth.  I ignored how  other people judged her because I was practicing and still try to  promote positive energy values, the kind that eventually lead to desires materializing.

It’s funny how new information erupts those memories.  In hindsight, you see it all clearly, how your actions contributed to the reality.  Why did I overshare?  My consequence was humiliation, embarrassment, isolation…the kind of stuff that heals with a new relationship and better friend choices.  Nobody died.

Reading Sunrise on the Reaping by Suzanne Collins was a wonderful way for me to escape the ruminating and relate to someone else’s decision making catastrophes based on their grim circumstances.   We know Haymitch’s story.  He is portrayed by Woody Harrelson in the Katniss Everdeen Hunger Games trio of movies.  We know he wins the games as a teen and we know he becomes a drunk to escape the horrors of this dystopian premise where children from the Districts are sent to fight to the death for the pleasure of a viewing audience and to commemorate a horrendous civil war.  This is supposedly the future of the United States of America.

The children (ages 12-18) are selected in a reaping ceremony on the 4th of July.  In Haymitch’s case, his selection does not come from the sorting jar and is basically, to him, unfair.  I mean, let’s face it, you care about him from the get-go.  He is a dutiful son and a loving boyfriend to a Covey girl.  He is trying to protect her when it happens.

So here’s the thing:  Suzanne Collins is a self-proclaimed army brat.  She grew up around the military and around conversations of war and destruction and so forth.  So there is a very sad tone to the novels, where people are living in poverty and seem to feel guilty for trying to steal a modicum of happiness.  People are basically, doomed.  And there is tremendous violence in these novels.  I am really not sure how she concocts all these different ways for people to die via weapons, poison, drone attacks, fire, et al.  Somehow she invents new scenarios that leave you completely grossed out.

The Coveys are the only group, a band of gypsy singers trapped in District 12 as we learned in Collins’ previous prequel, who resonate with New Age thinking – eternal life stuff, focusing on beauty, art, music, color, love, etc.

Haymitch Abernathy doesn’t really do that.  The whole time he thinks he will die.  He doesn’t expect to win and basically, keeps complaining about the situation he’s in, all while doing his best to protect others, to trust others.  He wants to be this person who acts in a way that his family and others can be proud of him.   And yet, he doesn’t think he can or will or, well, the inevitable happens.  He does end up killing a few kids.  No spoilers – he wins at the Hunger Games but he loses everything else.  His biggest fear manifests and everyone knows that fears win out in the end.  Is there a way to live without fear?  To commit to a belief system where only good things happen?  Not in Suzanne Collins’ Hunger Games world, unfortunately.

It’s tragic.  I didn’t cry for him because he quite literally goes on and on about the negative implications of his actions, he ends up allowing the negativity to defeat him and finally, he winds up hating himself.

The thing is – his gut is telling him all along what his heart wants to reject.  In the end, he spills his guts and we love him for it.  Great metaphor, Suzanne.

Lucky us in the real world with the power to choose.  Life is supposed to be fun and the whole point is to find what you like and do it.  If it is a family you want, if it is an activity you desire; if it is alone time you crave, you know?  Do that.

And even if you can achieve that rose-colored glasses outlook to life where following joy resides, trust your gut.  Because you are not even supposed to force relationships or chase happiness.  It will all come to you.  It will follow you without you having to/trying to manipulate the outcome.

Lesson(s) learned.  Thank you, Suzanne Collins, for helping me realize that I can close chapters of my life and move into new and exciting ones instead of just waiting/wanting to die.

Book Report: From the Mixed-Up Files of Mrs. Basil E. Frankweiler

I’ve been  wanting to revisit From the Mixed-Up Files of Mrs. Basil E. Frankweiler by E.L. Konigsburg for a long while.  The copyright on this book is 1965.  I’m pretty sure I read it when I was the same age as protagonist Claudia Kincaid, so I’m guessing that was a half century ago and yet, for many years of late, I would bring this book up in conversation with students anytime we talked about field trips.  I had wanted them or at least one of them to read it before we took the three different bus trips to the Metropolitan Museum of Art in Manhattan between 2006 and 2008.

Once arrived (all three times!), my students behaved in similar fashion to those descriptions Claudia makes about other children as relayed in deposition manner to Mrs. Basil E. Frankweiler – ungrateful, inconsiderate, not really wanting to learn anything, etc.  None of them wanted to hide in the museum either or solve a big mystery.   Poo-poo on them.

I remembered the bit in the story about the siblings running away from home to hide in the Met – I couldn’t remember why, how they did it and how Mrs. Basil E. Frankweiler fit into the story.

It was a refreshing reread and impressive to find Claudia and her somewhat reluctant brother having their adventure include learning…and research!  It was also evident to me why this book resonated with my twelve-year-old self and why on the reread all these years later I sobbed uncontrollably once I got to the final page.

This is a story about propelling oneself in the direction of adventure and dreams, of willing oneself to plan and execute an idea eliminating fear of future consequences in order to fulfill some ethereal secret dream.  It was relatable to me then and more so now.

In many ways I am Claudia, both pre-teen and adult Claudia simultaneously and I’m also Mrs. Basil E. Frankweiler, although not quite as old AND I’m Elaine Konigsburg, do you know what I mean?  Because those dreams you have as a kid – they never leave you and when you are older and you review your progress, you kind of find out that you are either rolling out new dreams to chase or encouraging others to dream big.  And running away as a means to authenticity is very appealing.

As you begin to read the first chapter, you learn about Claudia (Claude)  Kincaid and her brother James (Jamie).  You think this is just a third person perspective thingy until you realize that Mrs. Basil E. Frankweiler is narrating the whole scenario as expressed in a letter to her lawyer.  It’s a genius POV because the audience learns who she is but not why she knows this stuff until the moment that the characters’ lives intersect.

There were no Amber Alerts back in 1965.  The frantic parents are mentioned but not so much to invoke a fear-based drama or the potential for a horror story.  And it is also not an instruction pamphlet on how to run away from a nice suburban home in Connecticut.

It’s more about being heard.  It’s about being responsible about an irresponsible choice.  It’s ultimately about being seen authentically as well.  Being seen and heard.  I mean, you’ll have to read it and decide that between-the-lines stuff for yourself.  The message is not just for kids.

Mrs. Basil E. Frankweiler is eighty-two and she is preparing her will, revising her will, selling artwork from her vast collection and preparing to down-size.  She is a wealthy widow who is still spry with her wits about her.  She is like a kind fairy god-mother to these children.

Elaine passed away in 2013.  She was eighty-three.  In the afterward portion of my copy of the book, one she’d added for the book’s thirty-fifth anniversary, she shared some anecdotes with regard to writing the book, researching the landscape and fictionalizing the part about Michaelangelo.  I really fell in love with this woman I did not ever know, because her depth of character was just…epic.

I got my copy of From the Mixed-Up Files of Mrs. Basil E. Frankweiler by E.L. Konigsburg from the public library.  You can also purchase a copy here.

 

Book Report: Gentlemen Prefer Blondes

A rainy day is the perfect time to finish a novel then investigate the movie by the same name. The movie was adapted from the Broadway musical screenplay that Anita Loos co-authored. It was released in 1953 starring Jane Russell and Marilyn Monroe.

The book was published in 1925.

That’s almost one hundred years ago! The characters are similar. I mean their names are the same – Lorelei and Dorothy. One is a blonde and the other a brunette. The title of the novel is actually Gentlemen Prefer Blondes and But Gentlemen Marry Brunettes: two stories. One is told in diary form as Lorelei navigates her journey to marriage and the other is mostly exposition, as Lorelei recounts the actions taken by Dorothy, including her back story of hardship, on her path to marrying her wealthy guy.

Yes – that marriage plot point is the same. The whole thing started when Anita Loos, already a successful screenwriter for Hollywood silent films and a member of the Round table gang (literary types who gathered to exchange witticisms – most people my age and older know this reference), noticed that young starlets were accepting casting couch invites even back then.

I think she was amused by their behavior and maybe didn’t think highly of them. She began penning this story to indulge that amusement while on a train from New York to California or the reverse.

The story had been released as a serial, each chapter in the monthly Harper’s Bazaar magazine and women loved it. It was considered really risque to show bold unmarried women as sexual beings, getting what they wanted – wealth, diamonds, etc. from wealthy men just because they were beautiful.

Specifically Lorelei. She is clearly a kept woman and even though it isn’t mentioned, she is most definitely having sex with Eisman and other men. And she is a teenager.

Yes, they called them flappers back then. Young and single women who wanted to have fun. They partied all night long with all sorts of men – meaning married and single. Mostly wealthy men who traveled to New York City on business trips.

Lorelei states that she had been an actress but the very married Mr. Eisman who wants to “educate her”, who pays for her trip to Paris, as well as her many shopping trips, her apartment in Manhattan and a maid, does not want her working. She says he thinks she aught to write her thoughts down because she is so smart – and this we as readers think is laugh-out-loud funny because the author deliberately misspells words and we think that the stereotypical (dumb) blonde has arrived.

But we are in for a surprise because what Lorelei lacks in book smarts, she makes up for in manipulative-sexy shrew smarts.

I think in 1925, women readers secretly wished they could be Lorelei more than mocking her foolish antics. There’s this one bit when she is in France and she comments that it is nice to have platonic friendships with men – this innocuous comment slides in the deeper meaning – that she is sleeping with all the rest of them – in a way that seems more provocative than I expected for a one-hundred-year-old novel.

How great would it be to have been a party girl in the 1920s with men clammoring to buy you dinner and showing their affection via diamonds and pearls and tiaras and whatnot?

I would love to see a film made about this book that is more accurate to its correct time period. not as a musical, not with twenty-year-old women who look thirty-five, IDK. When I imagined the characters as I was reading, I did not see Monroe. In fact, her characterization of Lorelei was a bit overacted. Jane Russell’s Dorothy was much better. When Dorothy gets wet in the movie (oh, btw, that scene with the men in swimwear is AMAZING), she looks like a modern girl. She’s so pretty without all the technicolor make-up and 1950s hairdo.

The book and the movie are really two different incarnations of the machinations of Anita Loos’ wry wit, style and overall talent for creating such memorable characters.

Read the book then let me know what you think. It’s so FUN!

Book Report: The Big Door Prize

I can’t remember the last time I wrote a book synopsis. I’m going to guess around 1975. I have never joined a book club, so that doesn’t help. Three months ago, a friend let me borrow a couple of books that I neglected to finish. When people recommend things to me, I often wonder if they know me at all.

Okay, with that disclaimer over with, let’s move on to my new blog category – Book Report. This may or may not be a monthly gig, as I haven’t been reading a lot. But I went to the eye doctor to establish that I still have 20/20 vision yet paid the extra money to get two pairs of designer progressives (readers to make the font bigger, lol). I need a reason to wear them, so no excuses. And, this book, The Big Door Prize by M.O. Walsh is worth sharing.

I have Apple TV + . I got it to watch Palm Royale and found their other series to be pretty great. The Big Door Prize just finished a second season and as I was scrolling the credits, I noticed it was based on a novel.

The premise is that a mystery machine appears in the grocery store. Called DNAMIX in the book and MORPHO in the show, it offers the customers a card listing their life potentials. This causes many individuals to quit their jobs and follow the instructed path – that is, if they resonate with the result.

The main character is a teacher and since I am about to retire after thirty years of teaching, I was thinking about this chosen profession – was it the right one? Will I now seek my true heart’s desire and what exactly is it? It isn’t/wasn’t teaching, right? Is that machine real? Do I even know myself? Why don’t you just tell me what it is….

Not sure if this is a spoiler, but the teacher gets…teacher. This made me cry. It just sucked. For me, not necessarily for the character. Well, the television show didn’t answer my questions about this mysterious machine. Was it indeed magical and where were they going with it? I decided to read the book and found the answer to that question.

Not sure how they will work back to that result in the show because the characters are not quite the same. Funny how they relocated the Trina character. She is the priest’s niece in the book and the teacher’s daughter in the series. Others have different professions in the book versus the show, and some characters in the Apple + incarnation don’t even exist in the book. The gist of the characters is similar though. The way you end up caring about them in both is top-notch.

The author dives inside the characters’ heads. Exposition more than dialogue here and it works because it really packs an emotional punch. I grew to love each one with every page turn because I learned their motivations for action based on their past experiences.

I love a good depth of character, I really do!

The novel is filled with humor and I am impressed by the differences in each character’s inner and outer voices, mannerisms, senses of humor and ability versus inability to edit themselves verbally. So good.

The Louisiana town is fictional. The author is from Louisiana so these bits of information regarding life in that neck of the woods, that write-what-you-know thing gives the story that fleshed out vibe. Are they parts of real people? One likes Pokemon card games, another plays the trombone, and two others have medical issues. There is a lot of relatable stuff – like, perhaps you know people like this or you think, does Milton Walsh know me?

All the story lines unite at the end of the novel. It’s so good!

I can’t get enough – meaning I love that the TV series takes everything a step further, uncovering new plots and new connections. I think when these producers purchase the rights to novels they pay the author one price then take their liberties. I watched a YouTube video with him and he said he was incredibly grateful for that turn of events. At some point the author must let go of the desire to control his own characters and allow them to morph(o).

Let me know what you think.

I borrowed the book from the Onondaga Public Library but you can also acquire it here.